Why You Are Always Wrong When You Accuse A Liberal Of Being Wrong. by Dean Gotcher

Why You Are Always "Wrong" When You Accuse A Liberal Of Being Wrong.
(Personal note.)

by
Dean Gotcher

"There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death." Proverbs 16:25

A liberal never sees his "self" as being wrong, with wrong being punishable. He can only see his "self" (at the most) as needing to do things better "the next time" (when he does wrong). Not being wrong, he is therefore not to be held accountable for what he has done wrong to others, i.e., he is not to be punished. This does not stop him from accusing you of being wrong, needing to be punished for accusing him of being wrong, i.e., for hurting his "feelings."

"For all that is in the world, the lust of the flesh, and the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life, is not of the Father, but is of the world." 1 John 2:16

In a discussion there is right and there is wrong—according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth—with you trying to persuade (convince) others that they are wrong, when they are wrong, and accept your position as right and do what is right instead of wrong. This is indicative of the father's/Father's authority (system or paradigm) where the individual is accountable for his thoughts and actions, according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Therefore in a discussion you must suspend, as upon a cross your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts," i.e., your "self interests" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, i.e., you must humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to hear and receive the truth—doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth as a consequence—which engenders a guilty conscience in you when you do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., when you "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, instead of doing the father's/Father's will.

"In the dialogic relation of recognizing oneself in the other, they experience the common ground of their existence." (Jürgen Habermas, Knowledge & Human Interest, Chapter Three: The Idea of the Theory of Knowledge as Social Theory)

It is in dialogue we discover our commonality with one another, i.e., our common "self interests" in each other, 'justifying' (affirming) our "self," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., what which we have in common, i.e., that which is "of the world" only.

"When a man has finally reached the point where he does not think he knows it better than others, that is when he has become indifferent to what they have done badly and he is interested only in what they have done right, then peace and affirmation have come to him." (G. F. W. Hegel, in Carl Friedrich, The Philosophy of Hegel) Following this "logic," then Karl Marx was "more right than wrong," as can be written on the demolition experts tomb (after blowing himself and others up) "He was more right than wrong."

In dialogue, on the other hand there is no wrong, there is only right and "better." Dialogue is indicative of the child's carnal nature where he, loving ("lusting" after) pleasure and hating restraints (the father's/Father's authority), seeks to 'justify' his "self," i.e., doing what he wants, when he wants instead of having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline his "self" in order to do right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth that causes him to miss out on pleasure. For example, the "old" marriage vow was "for better or for worse, till death do us part." The "new" marriage now reads "for better or for worse, till someone 'better' comes along"—what most ministers are preaching/condoning these days ("Whoever/whatever makes you happy.").

"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men; but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men is abomination in the sight of God." Luke 16:15

In dialogue you must suspend, as upon a cross any command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of your and the other persons carnal desires, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interests" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. In order for you to come to an agreement, i.e. a consensus with others, determining what is "right" in the 'moment' for both you and them, i.e., seeking to "esteem" your "self," i.e., 'justify' your "self," i.e., your doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., your "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, you must participate in dialogue, affirming each other's carnal nature, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interests" of the 'moment,' 'justifying' each other's dissatisfaction with, resentment toward, hatred of the father's/Father's authority which gets in the way, i.e., 'justifying' your questioning, challenging, defying, disregarding, attacking (negating) authority, doing so without having a guilty conscience (which the father's/Father's authority engenders for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., for "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating). In your opinion, in dialogue, in the consensus process (the three attributes of the French Revolution, i.e., Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) there is no father's/Father's authority, i.e., no "Can not's," "Must not's," "Thou shalt not's," i.e., no "Because I say so"/"It is written" there is only the carnal desires, i.e., "lusts," i.e., "self interests" of all the participants, freely being shared without fear of judgment, condemnation, or damnation (being cast out).

"And through covetousness shall they with feigned words make merchandise of you." 2 Peter 2:3

Through dialogue, gaining access to your "self interests," i.e., to what you "lust" after, i.e., to what you "covet" in the 'moment,' using double speak ("feigned words," which means "plastic words" in the Greek), i.e., giving you what you want to hear in order to gain their trust thereby being able to move you down their pathway, facilitator's of 'change,' as charlatans, pedophiles, pimps are able to seduce, deceive, and manipulate you, turning you into one of Thorndike's chickens, Skinner's rats, or Pavlov's dog, i.e., into "human resource" to be used for their own pleasure and gain, i.e., so they can buy and sell you on the market place of man's carnal desires to the highest bidder, casting anyone away (including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous) who get in their way or no longer give them pleasure, without having a guilty conscience. The road to "Utopia" is paved with the bodies of those who got in the way.

"The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" Jeremiah 17:9

Your heart establishes the child's carnal nature in you, i.e., your "lust" for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates as the standard for "good" instead of doing the father's/Father's will, i.e., having to set aside your carnal desires ("lusts") of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order (as in "old" world order) to do the father's/Father's will, i.e., in order to do right and not wrong according the father's/Father's established commands, rules, facts, and truth. Your heart is "desperately wicked" in that it hates restraint, i.e., hates the father's/Father's authority for "getting in the way," i.e. for preventing, i.e., inhibiting or blocking you from enjoying the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) that the world stimulates. You can not see your hate of restraint, i.e., your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., the Karl Marx in you as being evil, i.e., "wicked" ("desperately wicked") because your love of pleasure, i.e., your "lust," i.e., your "self interest" (getting in the way) blinds you to it. Like a drug your "lust" for pleasure (dopamine emancipation), i.e., your "self interest," i.e., "the lust of the flesh, the lust of the eyes, and the pride of life," i.e., that which the world stimulates blinds you to your hatred toward restraint, i.e., blinds you to your hatred toward the father's/Father's authority, i.e., blinds you to your "wickedness"—which is being expressed toward the father/Father (and those who have faith in and obey him/Him), who is preventing or trying to prevent you from having access to the drug, i.e., to pleasure (dopamine emancipation) when you are doing wrong, disobeying, sinning—as being "wicked," making you not just "wicked" but "desperately wicked" in your effort to attain pleasure, keep pleasure, or get pleasure back, which includes the praises (affirmation, i.e., 'justification') of men, with you removing or attempting to remove anyone who is getting in the way. No matter how much you try to 'justify' your "self" before men, seeking after and getting men's approval (affirmation), i.e., pleasing men you can not be or become "good." Only God is good. The only way you can become "good" in your eyes (and in the eyes of others) is to 'justify' your "self" (and their "self"), i.e., your "lust" (and their "lust") for the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world stimulates, becoming God your "self" (making them God as well), determining right from wrong, good from evil according to your (and their) carnal nature, i.e., from your (and their) own "self," i.e., from your (and their) "sensuous needs" ("the lust of the flesh") and your (and their) "sense perception" ("the lust of the eyes"), i.e., from your (and their) "sense experiences" of this life ("the pride of life"), with pleasure being "right" and restraint, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, getting in the way of pleasure being "wrong." (Karl Marx, MEGA I/3)

"To enjoy the present reconciles us to the actual." (Karl Marx, Critique of Hegel's 'Philosophy of Right') In other words: "Lust reconciles you to the world."

The objective of replacing discussion (doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth) with dialogue (your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires, i.e., your "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e.., the current situation and/or people are stimulating, which includes your resentment toward authority for getting in the way), when it comes to right and wrong behavior is to "prevent someone who KNOWS from filling the empty space," so the liberal can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience, i.e., without being held accountable for his thoughts and actions. (Wilfred Bion, A Memoir of the Future) The "empty space" in the pyramid on the American dollar bill is dialogue, so those in power—those on the top part of the pyramid (through dialogue knowing what everyone is thinking)—are not accountable for what they do to those below them (the bottom part of the pyramid), including the unborn, the elderly, the innocent, and the righteous, who get in their way, so they can "enjoy" the carnal pleasures, i.e., "lusts" of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience.

"The transgression of the wicked saith within my heart, that there is no fear of God before his eyes. For he flattereth himself in his own eyes, until his iniquity be found to be hateful. The words of his mouth are iniquity and deceit: he hath left off to be wise, and to do good. He deviseth mischief upon his bed; he setteth himself in a way that is not good; he abhorreth not evil." Psalms 36:1-4

This is why 'liberal's' always rephrase your facts, i.e., "right-wrong," i.e., discussion based question into a dialogue, i.e., a "feelings," i.e., an opinion based question so the outcome is never one which accuses them of being wrong, i.e., that holds them accountable for their carnal thoughts and carnal actions. The answers are in the questions, i.e., in how the question are asked (phrased). "What do you know ...?" is different than "How do you feel ...?" and "What do you think ...?" The former holds you accountable to facts and truth, the latter two, only being an opinion, do not. Changing communication from discussion to dialogue is the key element to 'change,' 'liberating' the liberal from having a guilty conscience, i.e., from having any sense of accountability for his carnal thoughts and carnal actions—his definition of "peace." By placing children in a dialogue based environment, dealing with right and wrong behavior, with dialogue (opinion, i.e., "I feel ..." and "I think ...") being right and discussion (right-wrong, i.e., "I am right, and therefore you are wrong") being wrong, the facts based children, unable to carry on a discussion are neutered while the "feelings" based children, "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating are affirmed. Dialogue, i.e., being "positive" negates discussion, i.e. being "negative." In the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus environment, i.e., in the "group grade," "team building" classroom, workplace, etc., right and wrong are not based upon established commands, rules, facts, and truth but upon how people communicate with one another, with dialogue, i.e., "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating being right and discussion, i.e., doing right and not wrong according to established commands, rules, facts, and truth being wrong. When a liberal states "Everyone is entitled to their opinion" in response to your telling them they are wrong, they simply want you to agree, neutering yourself in the process in order to initiate or sustain relationship with them, affirming their doing wrong, disobeying, sinning, i.e., their "lusting" after the carnal pleasures of the moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating. If you refuse to agree (if you refuse "to agree to disagree"—which would make your position, i.e., facts and truth an opinion), i.e., if you continue to tell them they are wrong then you are wrong, needing counseling, i.e., therapy—what "mental health" (brainwashing, i.e., washing the father's/Father's authority from the brain) is all about.

"Prior to therapy the person is prone to ask himself, 'What would my parents want me to do?' During the process of therapy the individual come to ask himself, 'What does it mean to me?'" "Experience is, for me, the highest authority." "Neither the Bible nor the prophets, neither the revelations of God can take precedence over my own direct experience." (Carl Rogers, on becoming a person: A Therapist View of Psychotherapy)

In this way, i.e. through therapy "self," i.e., the 'liberal' (in you) is 'liberated' from the father's/Father's authority so you, now a 'liberal' can "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' that the world, i.e., the current situation and/or people are stimulating without having a guilty conscience. For more on the subject of 'liberalism' see the issues: Why Liberals, Socialists, Globalists Are Never Wrong, What Liberals, Socialists, Globalists Have In Common, What Liberals Fear, Understanding 'Liberals,' 'Liberal's,' Socialist's (National and Global) "abhor not evil," Democratization, Socialism, Liberalism, Communism, Globalism, "Group Psychotherapy," Consensus, etc., is all about ...., The Liberal Mind, Liberals in Conservative Disguise, The Difference between Fundamentalists and Liberals.

"For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables." 2 Timothy 4:3, 4

Facilitators of 'change,' i.e., psychologists, i.e., behavioral "scientists," i.e., "group psychotherapists," i.e., Marxists (Transformational Marxists)—all being the same in method or formula—are using the dialoguing of opinions to a consensus (affirmation) process, i.e., dialectic 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings" of the 'moment,' i.e., from/through their "lust" for pleasure and their hate of restraint, in the "light" of their desire for group approval, i.e., affirmation and fear of group rejection) in the "group grade," "safe zone/space/place," "Don't be negative, be positive," soviet style, brainwashing (washing the father's/Father's authority from the children's thoughts and actions, i.e., "theory and practice," negating their having a guilty conscience, which the father's/father's authority engenders, for doing wrong, disobeying, sinning in the process—called "the negation of negation" since the father's/Father's authority and the guilty conscience, being negative to the child's carnal nature, is negated in dialogue—in dialogue, opinion, and the consensus process there is no father's/Father's authority), inductive 'reasoning' ('reasoning' from/through the students "feelings," i.e., their natural inclination to "lust" after the carnal pleasures of the 'moment'—dopamine emancipation—which the world stimulates, i.e., their "self interest," i.e., their "sense experience," selecting "appropriate information"—excluding, ignoring, or resisting, i.e., rejecting any "inappropriate" information, i.e., established command, rule, fact, or truth that gets in the way of their desired outcome, i.e., pleasure—in determining right from wrong behavior), "Bloom's Taxonomy," "affective domain," French Revolution (Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité) classroom "environment" in order (as in "new" world order) to 'liberate' children from parental authority, i.e., from the father's/Father's authority system (the Patriarchal Paradigm)—seducing, deceiving, and manipulating them as chickens, rats, and dogs, i.e., treating them as natural resource ("human resource") in order to convert them into 'liberals,' socialists, globalists, so they, 'justifying' their "self" before one another, can do wrong, disobey, sin, i.e., "lust" with impunity.

"Thus saith the LORD, Stand ye in the ways, and see, and ask for the old paths, where is the good way, and walk therein, and ye shall find rest for your souls. But they said, We will not walk therein. Also I set watchmen over you, saying, Hearken to the sound of the trumpet. But they said, We will not hearken." Jeremiah 6:16, 17

Home schooling material, co-ops, conferences, etc., are joining in the same praxis, fulfilling Immanuel Kant's as well as Georg Hegel's, Karl Marx's, and Sigmund Freud's agenda of using the pattern or method of Genesis 3:1-6, i.e., "self" 'justification,' i.e., dialectic (dialogue) 'reasoning," i.e., 'reasoning' from/through your "feelings," i.e., your carnal desires of the 'moment' which are being stimulated by the world (including your desire for approval from others, with them affirming your carnal nature) in order to negate Hebrews 12:5-11, i.e., the father's/Father's authority, i.e., having to humble, deny, die to, control, discipline your "self" in order to do the father's/Father's will, negating Romans 7:14-25, i.e., your having a guilty conscience when you do wrong, disobey, sin, thereby negating your having to repent before the father/Father for your doing wrong, disobedience, sins—which is the real agenda.

"And for this cause [because men, as "children of disobedience," 'justify' their "self," i.e., 'justify' their love of "self" and the world, i.e., their love of the carnal pleasures of the 'moment' (dopamine emancipation) which the world stimulates over and therefore against the Father's authority] God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie [that pleasure is the standard for "good" instead of doing the Father's will]: That they all might be damned who believed not the truth [in the Father and in His Son, Jesus Christ], but had pleasure in unrighteousness [in their "self" and the pleasures of the 'moment,' which the world stimulates]." 2 Thessalonians 2:11, 12